Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Latest Threads |
Bent Steering Column
Forum: Forum chat...
Last Post: Lowbarn
1 hour ago
» Replies: 5
» Views: 376
|
What have you done today ...
Forum: Forum chat...
Last Post: Malcolm Parker
2 hours ago
» Replies: 6,602
» Views: 1,389,666
|
Cleaning Block Waterways
Forum: Forum chat...
Last Post: Chris KC
4 hours ago
» Replies: 6
» Views: 230
|
source for taper pins
Forum: Forum chat...
Last Post: Steve Jones
Yesterday, 12:11 PM
» Replies: 5
» Views: 202
|
RP Saloon Sill & Floor Re...
Forum: Forum chat...
Last Post: Goldnrust
Yesterday, 10:25 AM
» Replies: 4
» Views: 197
|
1929 Chummy Headlights
Forum: Forum chat...
Last Post: Tony Press
20-01-2025, 09:49 PM
» Replies: 3
» Views: 126
|
Midlands A7 Club Events 1...
Forum: Forum chat...
Last Post: MatthewMyerscough
20-01-2025, 06:57 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 191
|
Austin Ruby 2 for sale
Forum: Sales
Last Post: JaneAustin
20-01-2025, 01:14 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 76
|
Piston ring scuffing
Forum: Forum chat...
Last Post: Dave Mann
20-01-2025, 10:17 AM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 225
|
Crankshaft advice
Forum: Forum chat...
Last Post: Bluebird7
19-01-2025, 11:22 PM
» Replies: 24
» Views: 1,147
|
|
|
Cracked Blocks |
Posted by: Chris KC - 13-10-2018, 05:45 PM - Forum: Forum chat...
- Replies (19)
|
|
Apologies if covered before, but many cylinder blocks now have small cracks radiating out from the centre head stud. The general consensus seems to be use another one if you have the choice.
I'm curious, has anyone actually suffered an engine failure as a result of these cracks?
And if yes, what happened? (Water in the bore? Stud pulled out? Or something more dramatic...?)
Anyone found a way to repair them?
Thanks
Chris
|
|
|
Peter Relph |
Posted by: Chris Garner - 13-10-2018, 05:16 PM - Forum: Forum chat...
- Replies (19)
|
|
It is my sad task to announce that Peter Relph sadly passed away yesterday, 12th October. Peter was a former editor of the Grey Mag and also of the PWA7C magazine. A long standing and staunch supporter of the Association, member of Pre War and the VSCC, he was a lover of all vintage machinery especially Austin Sevens. He will be sadly missed by many people. RIP Peter.
Chris Garner
Chairman - A7CA.
|
|
|
A7 parts at auction |
Posted by: john deacon - 12-10-2018, 08:02 PM - Forum: Forum chat...
- Replies (2)
|
|
Hi,
not sure if anyone would be interested but there are a pile of A7 bits at PSP Auctions Buckingham MK18 tomorrow.
Looks like mostly engine, front and rear axle, take a look.
|
|
|
Ruby Trafficators |
Posted by: Jamie - 12-10-2018, 07:32 AM - Forum: Forum chat...
- Replies (4)
|
|
Good morning.
Can anyone confirm which model of trafficator is fitted to the Ruby? Is it the SF34?
Assuming spare lenses and other components for these to as elusive as I think that they are, does anyone know whether the arm, cover and orange lens from the Morris Minor SF80 type can be fitted?
Regards,
Jamie.
|
|
|
Transferring a registration number to an A7 |
Posted by: Ian M - 11-10-2018, 12:59 PM - Forum: Forum chat...
- Replies (37)
|
|
I'm seeking some guidance about a slightly unusual situation regarding a registration number transfer. A double transfer, in fact.
Some time ago, I owned a Morris 8 and sold it after a while in favour of something else. The new owner kept it for a few years, but when they eventually sold it, the car went abroad. In order to prevent the complete loss of the original registration upon export, the foreign buyer suggested that they retain the number. This they did and simply put the number onto their modern car.
Fast forward to just a few days ago and I have kindly been offered the opportunity to buy the number from them, as they are in the process of selling the (modern) car that's currently wearing it. This idea is very attractive to me, as I have a Ruby that has worn an age-related plate since being dragged out of a barn 35 years ago, and I naturally like the idea of giving it a number that has been in my possession in the past.
The seller has offered to arrange transfer directly to the Ruby, which is fine, except that I am concerned about the possibility of unnecessarily losing the present age-related number in the process. As it was issued such a long time ago, I don't think it has non-transferrable status, but I'm not sure if it's possible to tell from the V5C alone. The other concern is whether there are any conditions to removing the present number from the Ruby and putting it onto retention in my name. Of course, I've been reading up about this at the DVLA website, but I'm still not really clear about the whole thing. I remember that in the past it was necessary for a vehicle to have an MoT before the number can be removed. If so, that could be problematic, as the car is presently not roadworthy, although it is taxed and insured.
Has anyone else had recent experience of a scenario similar to the above? Many thanks.
Just to add to the above, this is the page at the DVLA website I am now studying. Another thing that's not clear is how I would tie the two transfers together. The DVLA website states that upon removing the number (from the Ruby), an alternative is allocated automatically, but of course I don't want that. The number originally from the Morris 8 is intended to take its place.
https://www.gov.uk/personalised-vehicle-...number-off
|
|
|
standard exhaust performance |
Posted by: JonE - 11-10-2018, 09:55 AM - Forum: Forum chat...
- Replies (22)
|
|
I have always been intrigued by the Birkett statement in the green book suggesting long, narrow bore 7/8" ID tailpipes were best. This old forum 2014 thread is worth re-invigorating:
http://pub25.bravenet.com/forum/static/s...8&cmd=show
Ray White's comments on replacing the large bore rear pipe of his Swallow with an 1" bore (and finding it improved) contrasts with Sandy Croall's observation that when his LWB rear pipe fell off, performance improved (it became akin to the SWB system).
Any more recent experiences from those experimenting with standard manifolds and engines? Were Austin exhausts overspecced in diameter?
|
|
|
Clutch toggle lever pins |
Posted by: Ian M - 11-10-2018, 09:12 AM - Forum: Forum chat...
- Replies (7)
|
|
Would anyone object to an Austin 10 question? It's just that I'm struggling to obtain information via the relevant club and forums, and feel that the Austin 7 folk are more inclined towards technical discussions, so might be better placed to advise. I do own a couple of Sevens, by the way!
The car is a 1934 10/4, a late chrome rad model. I'm nearing the end of a clutch rebuild, but there's one point of detail that isn't quite right and I don't want to put it all back together until I'm 100% happy with it all.
The three clutch toggle levers have hardened steel pins, similar to a 7, but of smaller diameter. The ones on my car are badly worn and must be replaced. These are tricky things to get hold of, but I did find one supplier. The original pins have a radius on each end, which ensures that there are no edges that would protrude from the toggle lever post. This is important, in order to prevent any possible fouling of the recesses of the pressure plate. However, the replacements lack the radius, although they do have a slight chamfer. I've tried putting one of the pins in my lathe and using a small sharpening stone to form a radius, but the metal is just too hard to make any real progress.
One suggestion is that I try making a set myself, out of silver steel. However, I'm not sure that my lathework skills are sufficient to get the pins just right, plus I've not worked with silver steel before. I presume that heat treatment would then need to follow, for hardening, but I have no prior experience of this.
Any advice, please? I've attached a couple of pictures, one showing the new and old pins, and the second illustrating how the edges of the pin-ends protrude slightly from the post.
Many thanks.
|
|
|
|