Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Forum Statistics |
» Members: 3,188
» Latest member: P4ddy
» Forum threads: 8,002
» Forum posts: 98,998
Full Statistics
|
Latest Threads |
What have you done today ...
Forum: Forum chat...
Last Post: Ruairidh Dunford
4 hours ago
» Replies: 6,550
» Views: 1,386,037
|
They Still Turn Up
Forum: Forum chat...
Last Post: Colin Morgan
8 hours ago
» Replies: 5
» Views: 231
|
Gearbox syncro confusion
Forum: Forum chat...
Last Post: Ivor Hawkins
9 hours ago
» Replies: 20
» Views: 745
|
District Nurse in a Ruby
Forum: Forum chat...
Last Post: AustinWood
22-12-2024, 10:55 PM
» Replies: 5
» Views: 285
|
Merry Christmas
Forum: Forum chat...
Last Post: David Cochrane
22-12-2024, 06:02 PM
» Replies: 14
» Views: 667
|
Chassis repair steel
Forum: Forum chat...
Last Post: Howard Wright
22-12-2024, 04:28 PM
» Replies: 13
» Views: 596
|
Rear main bearing oil sea...
Forum: Forum chat...
Last Post: Dave Mann
20-12-2024, 10:12 PM
» Replies: 31
» Views: 1,257
|
EA Sports(Ulster) door ca...
Forum: Forum chat...
Last Post: Robert Foreman
20-12-2024, 11:18 AM
» Replies: 4
» Views: 162
|
Cam Follower Question ???
Forum: Forum chat...
Last Post: Austin in the Shed
20-12-2024, 05:23 AM
» Replies: 10
» Views: 347
|
SU needles
Forum: Forum chat...
Last Post: Alan
18-12-2024, 03:00 PM
» Replies: 12
» Views: 417
|
|
|
Lights on a moving vehicle |
Posted by: Nick Salmon - 17-11-2017, 09:39 AM - Forum: Forum chat...
- Replies (17)
|
|
At the NEC last weekend I had a chat with a firm that is producing an L.E.D. illuminated warning triangle. It is a well built bit of kit and would most likely be far more effective than one that is not lit. It has about a dozen red LEDs which can either flash or be static.
Did occur to me that strapped the rear of a Seven and lit it would be a great safety measure both day and night. However I do realise there are rules governing this sort of thing. I guess flashing is an absolute no-no but would a static lit triangle be OK? Anyone know for certain?
The company is willing to enter into a discount arrangement for clubs.
|
|
|
Tickover revs will not reduce |
Posted by: Nick Salmon - 17-11-2017, 09:12 AM - Forum: Forum chat...
- Replies (6)
|
|
The RP has a standard Zenith 26VA carb. The spindle has no excessive movement up down and sideways but does move in and out by about 2mm.
I cannot get the idle revs to come down to a sensible level. I have removed the linkage, the choke arm is not in contact with the throttle arm, the idle screw is not touching the throttle arm. Yet it still is idling at around twice normal revs. It picks up cleanly.
Presumably the butterfly is not closing sufficiently?
Any suggestions?
|
|
|
Timing gear inspection cover |
Posted by: Rubbledog - 16-11-2017, 03:50 PM - Forum: Wants
- Replies (1)
|
|
Hi,
Has anyone out there got a timing gear inspection cover spare, as apparently I need to replace mine, ( see what's this on forum) I am obviously willing to pay for item & postage. Thanks
|
|
|
Value of Engine Balancing |
Posted by: Charles P - 15-11-2017, 08:49 PM - Forum: Forum chat...
- Replies (46)
|
|
Just pondering before I send the parts off.
Does anyone have qualified opinions on the value of dynamic balancing the full bottom end (crank, flywheel, rods, pistons) vs just the crank & flywheel?
It strikes me that crank whip must impact the value of balancing but how much?
I'm assuming that pistons and rods are statically balanced.
Thanks
Charles
|
|
|
Value of Engine Balancing |
Posted by: Charles P - 15-11-2017, 08:47 PM - Forum: Forum chat...
- Replies (1)
|
|
Just pondering before I set the parts off.
Does anyone have qualified opinions on the value of balancing the full bottom end (crank, flywheel, rods, pistons) vs just the crank & flywheel?
It strikes me that crank whip must impact the value of balancing but how much?
Thanks
Charles
|
|
|
Setting up Accuspark Distributor |
Posted by: Andy Bennett - 15-11-2017, 08:31 PM - Forum: Forum chat...
- Replies (15)
|
|
No problems with the mechanical fitting but I have a hopefully simple question regarding the electrical connections for the Accuspark unit. As no one else had asked a single question about this I have to assume I am being dense but wanted to be safe rather than risk blowing electronics.
I am fitting to a 33 box, positive earth.
The instructions state that my current set up will have positive/CB coil connection going to the distributor.
Looking at my Austin wiring diagram it agrees, with CB positive to distributor.
However, what I have is the negative terminal of the coil attached to the distributor. And I definitely have positive earth, with the positive battery terminal attached to the body.
The Accuspark instructions then go on to show the final set up with the negative terminal of the coil to the new distributor.
So, with my starting point apparently different from that described I am not sure quite how to proceed.
Having done some checking it seems a coil will work whichever way round it is wired but will give a stronger spark if wired 'correctly' with positive earth having positive coil contact to distributor.
So should I ignore what I have and effectively change round the leads to give a new starting point for the Accuspark to then follow instructions?
Unfortunately I had already removed the old distributor before discovering this so cannot simply reverse the coil contacts on the current set up to see the it works OK before adding in the variable of the new dizzy.
Thanks for any thoughts
Cheers
Andy
|
|
|
|