The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined variable $search_thread - Line: 60 - File: showthread.php(1617) : eval()'d code PHP 8.1.31 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/showthread.php(1617) : eval()'d code 60 errorHandler->error_callback
/showthread.php 1617 eval




Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The perfect car to impress members of the golf club
#11
The cult of the long bonnet was curious. Sold a lot of otherwise innocuos SS pre Jaguars. In the 1960s I espied a Rover 20 with the unswept mudguards in everyday use and was impressed. Buick 8s were common here. My father always desribed dogs with clean cut collie type noses as straight 8 dogs. From the drivers seat there is nothing like a car with a prow.
Reply
#12
(25-07-2020, 12:21 AM)Tony Griffiths Wrote: Actually, it was two in-line supercharged twin-cam engines giving a corrected 145 b.h.p. - but don't tell Lord Herbert.... (I've Photoshopped out the bonnet bulges just in case)

That would give it Porsche like performance! I don't think I would like to be anywhere near a Ruby saloon capable of 130mph plus. Perhaps not even in the same county! Big Grin
Reply
#13
(25-07-2020, 09:04 AM)David Stepney Wrote:
(25-07-2020, 12:21 AM)Tony Griffiths Wrote: Actually, it was two in-line supercharged twin-cam engines giving a corrected 145 b.h.p. - but don't tell Lord Herbert.... (I've Photoshopped out the bonnet bulges just in case)

That would give it Porsche like performance! I don't think I would like to be anywhere near a Ruby saloon capable of 130mph plus. Perhaps not even in the same county! Big Grin
One thing is certain David, the road-holding would have been far worse than any rear-engined Porsche!
Reply
#14
(25-07-2020, 11:04 AM)Tony Griffiths Wrote:
(25-07-2020, 09:04 AM)David Stepney Wrote:
(25-07-2020, 12:21 AM)Tony Griffiths Wrote: Actually, it was two in-line supercharged twin-cam engines giving a corrected 145 b.h.p. - but don't tell Lord Herbert.... (I've Photoshopped out the bonnet bulges just in case)

That would give it Porsche like performance! I don't think I would like to be anywhere near a Ruby saloon capable of 130mph plus. Perhaps not even in the same county! Big Grin
One thing is certain David, the road-holding would have been far worse than any rear-engined Porsche!

Exactly! And we haven't mentioned the brakes.......
Reply
#15
(25-07-2020, 08:20 PM)David Stepney Wrote:
(25-07-2020, 11:04 AM)Tony Griffiths Wrote:
(25-07-2020, 09:04 AM)David Stepney Wrote:
(25-07-2020, 12:21 AM)Tony Griffiths Wrote: Actually, it was two in-line supercharged twin-cam engines giving a corrected 145 b.h.p. - but don't tell Lord Herbert.... (I've Photoshopped out the bonnet bulges just in case)

That would give it Porsche like performance! I don't think I would like to be anywhere near a Ruby saloon capable of 130mph plus. Perhaps not even in the same county! Big Grin
One thing is certain David, the road-holding would have been far worse than any rear-engined Porsche!

Exactly! And we haven't mentioned the brakes.......
Brakes? What brakes? You know that the Skoda Superb and Rolls have an unbrella in each the front door - well, the straight Eight Ruby beat them by decades and had them as well - but not for shower protection, but for use as air brakes....
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)