The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined variable $search_thread - Line: 60 - File: showthread.php(1617) : eval()'d code PHP 8.1.31 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/showthread.php(1617) : eval()'d code 60 errorHandler->error_callback
/showthread.php 1617 eval




Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1923 Chummy - and a competition.
#1
If you're not a Facebook aficionado, you'll have missed this wonderful period picture of a very early example.
Remarkable to think that the basic chassis and engine design lasted almost 17 years; but, perhaps even more astonishing was the number of detail changes made in that time. Hence, nothing from a 1922/3 car would fit a late Ruby (would it?). It's called - "customer development".
Competition: what Austin Seven part, or parts, remained unchanged over the longest time span? I'll kick it off with: sidecreen hinges, used from the first post-pram-hood models until the last of the Open Road Tourers.


Attached Files Thumbnail(s)
   
Reply
#2
Does constant-loss oiling count Terry?
Reply
#3
How about wheel nuts and foot brake adjusting wing nut?
Reply
#4
Front mains retainer plate?
Reply
#5
Side water manifold? Cylinder Block Barrel Nuts? Spring U Bolts?
Reply
#6
Steve beat me to the side water manifold; I don't think that changed throughout the life of the Seven. Did the track-rod and arms and the drag link change?
Reply
#7
Take it the picture wasnt taken when the car was new.

But I LOVE LOVE LOVE them foot scrapers.

Are they a period accessory.

I must make a pair for the 23 car.

Tony.
Reply
#8
The wheel nuts did change. I think it was 1936 for the MkII Ruby they were chromed.
Robert Leigh
Reply
#9
(30-04-2020, 11:57 AM)Chris KC Wrote: Does constant-loss oiling count Terry?
No, unfortunately, that's just a feature of the design, not a part.
Reply
#10
Square camshaft Bush retaining nut?
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)