Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 934 Threads: 22
Reputation:
10
Location: Near Cambridge, UK
Car type: 1928 tourer (mag type), short chassis Gould Ulster
I cannot see from your picture whether you still have the original quarter elliptic leaf springs. The coils and rubber cushions look heavy enough to be the current rear suspension, after removal of the leaf springs. Unless the non-standard frame carrying the new system is properly mounted to the chassis the present arrangement looks like a recipe for things bending where they should not. My instinct is to recommend reverting to the standard system.
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 314 Threads: 9
Reputation:
6
Location: TINOPAI NZ
Hi Sinirrop,
I am with Robert revert to original,
they are just a helper setup for over loading and not needed on a two seater. And not very well Engineered
Looks Like a great Project
Cheers Colin
NZ
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 1,750 Threads: 42
Reputation:
15
Location: Malvern, Victoria, Australia
Fit standard Chummy springs which are more cambered and not Sports which are flatter.
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 2,418 Threads: 33
Reputation:
37
Location: Deepest Frogland 30960
Car type: 1933 RP Standard Saloon
Hi. Just click on "website home" at the top of the page and then "Cherished Suppliers" you have a link to all the people that can help.
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 1,715 Threads: 47
Reputation:
25
Location: Auckland NZ
Car type: 36 Nippy, 31 RM, 38 Special, 24 Works Rep
Be very careful when assessing what is original on this car, my experience of Arrow cars, admittedly limited to one foursome we discovered here in NZ is that the chassis modifications and some of the body woodwork are, shall we say "Agricultural". I agree that the coil springs are a latter addition but don't discount some of the apparently "home made framing additions" you may well find they are as it left the Arrow factory.
Arrow registrar Jim Blacklock has some extensive pictures of original cars undergoing restoration and he would be well worth talking to.
Black Art Enthusiast