Joined: Jul 2018 Posts: 102 Threads: 33
Reputation:
1
How easy would it be to change the differential ratio for a slight lower over all gearing, 1st gear seems very short in a seven and useless 2nd gear hill starts are easily possible so I was looking at getting a bit more top end speed, just being able to sit at 45mph with a lower engine speed than what feels like a million rpm.
I'm not looking for any more speed just lower revs when I travel long journeys.
Hope to hear your thoughts
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 3,329 Threads: 372
Reputation:
16
Car type:
presumably you are already on standard 19" wheels?
Joined: Jul 2018 Posts: 102 Threads: 33
Reputation:
1
It'll be 17" as she's a ruby
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 3,329 Threads: 372
Reputation:
16
Car type:
I wonder if anyone has tried running 19" with a 4.00 section tyre on a Ruby. I bet it would end up being superslow though and not giving you appropriate revs at top end, as the body is so heavy. Perhaps counterproductive...
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 1,647 Threads: 23
Reputation:
15
Location: The village of Evenley
Car type: 1934 Austin Seven RP Deluxe
I think I’m right in saying the rolling radius of the 3.50 x 19 and the 4.00 x 17 is pretty much the same, so upping the final ratio would be the best option.
I stand to be corrected if I’m wrong!
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 741 Threads: 8
Reputation:
11
Location: N W Kent
16-05-2021, 08:32 PM
(This post was last modified: 16-05-2021, 08:33 PM by Stuart Giles.
Edit Reason: typo
)
When you say lower, you presumably mean numerically lower, so in ratio terms higher? The ratios fitted in Ruby axles were 8:42 (5.25:1) or 8:41 (5.125:1) in the later cars. You could fit a 9:44 (4.9:1) from a 1931 car, with a bit of jiggery pokery. But many people find that the 4.9 gearing is a bit tall for everyday top gear driving in anything other than a light special.
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 2,748 Threads: 31
Reputation:
95
Location: Auckland, NZ
16-05-2021, 08:59 PM
(This post was last modified: 17-05-2021, 12:06 AM by Bob Culver.)
For a small car the gearing is not especially low, although it does sound that way. Conveniently thought of as mph per 1000 rpm. The A30 was 12.7, Renault 750 13.5, Ford 10 13.7. Mayflower, SV Minx, A35, 100E, , MG 1250, Victor 1500, Mini Consul, were all under 15. Even the 80+ mph 1500 Jowett Javelin only 15.5 None were intended for motorways.
Have you ever tried a Fordson van or truck at 11.4 with the engine inside the cab! I suspect having driven one I could qualify for a hearing aid under Accident Compo.
The Seven 5.25:1 on 19x3.50 14.75. early cars 4.9:1 15.83 .(One effect is that 2nd in early cars closely matches 3rd in the 4 speed.)
Joined: Jan 2019 Posts: 1,567 Threads: 20
Reputation:
14
Location: Bala North Wales
Car type: 1933 RP Standard Saloon
Jake,
Assuming that you have bought the three bearing Ruby you mentioned earlier, it should be running on 4.00 (or 4,50) X 17 rims and tyres. 4.00 X 17 tyres rotate at approx 800 revs per mile, giving 14.29 mph per 1000 engine revs is top and 4.50 X 17s at 785 revs per mile, giving 14.56 mph per 1000 rpm.
3.50 X 19 rims and tyres rotate at 775 revs per mile, giving 14.75mph per 1000 rpm.
So, not much variation. Assuming the standard 5.25:1 diff, 45mph represents about 3000 rpm in top.
Austin Seven engines always sound busy: my RP (on 5.25:1 diff and 3.50 X 19 rims) is just this at 40 -45 mph, but has covered a lot of miles running at this sort of speed. A well sorted engine is really quite robust.
Hope this helps and gives some perspective on engine speed.