Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 1,462 Threads: 26
Reputation:
17
Location: North Yorkshire
22-11-2020, 12:51 PM
(This post was last modified: 22-11-2020, 12:58 PM by Steve Jones.)
I know a couple of people who've fitted these, Tony, and they work well. They don't look right, obviously, and I think they're an expensive solution to a problem that doesn't exist if you renovate your original starter motor correctly but, each to his own. Never seen one fitted to a Bacon Slicer, only to the later in cab type and you do have to remember that the torque of these starters when they're activated puts a significant load on the mountings for the alloy starter motor housing, the housing itself and the crankcase.
Steve
Joined: May 2018 Posts: 2,955 Threads: 558
Reputation:
20
Location: Peak District, Derbyshire
Car type: 1929 Chummy, 1930 Chummy, 1930 Ulster Replica, 1934 Ruby
22-11-2020, 12:58 PM
(This post was last modified: 22-11-2020, 12:59 PM by Tony Griffiths.)
What puzzled me was that, while the 'arrangement' looks to be in line with the original design, the mounting appears to be a 'flange' rather than a 'foot'. Perhaps there's an alternative model - or might it be supplied with some sort of adapter bracket?
The mounting appears to be a 'flange' rather than a 'foot' fitting. Perhaps there's an alternative model - or might it be supplied with some sort of adapter bracket?
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 1,462 Threads: 26
Reputation:
17
Location: North Yorkshire
No, Tony. They just bolt straight to the alloy housing flange to flange as the original (later in cab housing, not Bacon Slicer). They make a range of these starters to fit all sorts of pre-war cars the only real difference between them being the angle of the flange fitting and the hole number/spacing dependant on what they're being fitted to. Walk around a VSCC Race/Speed event paddock and you'll see loads of them (although only 2 regular A7 Class 1 cars that I can recall).
Steve
Joined: May 2018 Posts: 2,955 Threads: 558
Reputation:
20
Location: Peak District, Derbyshire
Car type: 1929 Chummy, 1930 Chummy, 1930 Ulster Replica, 1934 Ruby
Thanks, Steve, for the explanation; all is clear now - though it is an ugly-looking brute of a thing!
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 110 Threads: 24
Reputation:
0
Well - I've run one for a couple of years on my trials Chummy - That involves a lot of starts I can tell you! I got fed up repairing Austin starters and have had no problems since. The torque starters also use far less power, which has to be a good thing when your dynamo only puts out 6 amps anyway.
Not for an original Concours car, but damn good in the ruff and tuff.............