Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 56 Threads: 24
Reputation:
1
30-12-2017, 06:27 PM
(This post was last modified: 30-12-2017, 06:29 PM by Matt_Harnden.)
I’ve got the Opal on axle stands today ready to start some work to improve the alignment of the body.
Currently the vertical alignment of the coach lines between the hinge side of the door and the rear panel don’t line up too well. There is about a 3/4” drop and I want to try and improve this. I have fitted new hinge pins and the door shut lines are quite ok (although I have had to pack out the top hinge).
My plan is to add some hardwood packers between the body and chassis to try and slightly lift the body at the front half and hopefully then raise the door hinge point enough to improve the coachline.
Has anyone done similar work and do you have any tips? For example, should I add a packer under the cow horns or is it best to avoid this? Etc...
Thanks for your advice.
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 620 Threads: 7
Reputation:
7
Location: queensland
31-12-2017, 03:41 PM
(This post was last modified: 31-12-2017, 04:05 PM by squeak.
Edit Reason: more info
)
Matt, I would remove the spacing washers from the top hinge and this would raise the back edge of the door. The resultant larger gap in the back of door shut line could be improved by packing UP the body tub over the rear chassis extensions. Just my 2 cents cheers Russell
edit : on further thought IF this results in a "pinched" back of door shut line at the TOP, then add packing on the main chassis rails as well. You are moving the body UP relative to the cow horns, this will drag the windscreen forward, and the trailing edge of the door up. Any packing at the cow horns will result in misalignment of the starting handle to rad shell hole.
now 4 cents worth, cheers
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 3,329 Threads: 372
Reputation:
16
Car type:
I'm having similar problems with the Nippy, including not enough space between the dash rim and the steering wheel which makes me think about splaying the body a little to improve things. I'd been considering that some of the design characteristics - a completely horizontal bonnet hinge line - mean that differential packing front and back is going to be needed... but it keeps coming back to the need to centring the rad shell on the starter nose cone.
I'd wondered whether different engine mount rubbers exist or different charactersitics on the feet on crankcases (for instance, once a sports crankcase is lost and a Ruby one adopted) start off some of the problems for body fit?
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 620 Threads: 7
Reputation:
7
Location: queensland
Matt if you're happy with the fit so far, go ahead with the packing and bolt up the front half. If you're still happy then experiment with raising the rear half.
Bear in mind you will have then raised the body relative to the chassis along its entire length.
I'm not a fan of packing up the cow horns, some adjustment in starter hole fit can usually be achieved by slacking all the front panel bolts and pushing down on the rad cowl and/or raising the squashed rubber engine mounts.
Reduced packing at the front should reduce the requirement for packing all along the chassis particularly at the rear.
Thanks for the followup posting its always good to here results and good luck, cheers Russell
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 111 Threads: 5
Reputation:
7
Location: Pembrokeshire
I have never done Austin 7 body but have done a couple of Triumph Heralds, and I found it best to have all the fixing points loose to start with, when a satisfactory position is achieved with the spacers go around and nip up all the bolts a little bit at a time, recheck the alignment then tighten a bit more and repeat till every thing is tight, this way any thing that is out of line can be corrected as you go.