Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 3,329 Threads: 372
Reputation:
16
Car type:
05-07-2020, 09:47 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-07-2020, 09:47 PM by JonE.)
David Mawby sent a couple of pics from his unrestored 1930 AE tourer. He notes:
There is a recess where the staple fits on the scuttle one, but NOT on the radiator one.
The profiles are different, which is the same on the other cars I have with original rubbers.
...
So that is another interesting thing to ponder. Did the rad not warrant the protective but visually intrusive 'bump' of rubber?
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 1,711 Threads: 47
Reputation:
25
Location: Auckland NZ
Car type: 36 Nippy, 31 RM, 38 Special, 24 Works Rep
The more I look the more contradiction I am finding, several short chummy cowls and scuttle with holes in the crease, 29 type cowls with holes out from the crease, box saloon cowls with holes in the crease, my Nippy not in the crease????? Its worth noting that the step or joddle varies depending on which model we are looking at so I don't think that the one size fits all idea works, certainly the current offerings leave a bit to be desired on some cars.
Black Art Enthusiast
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 686 Threads: 112
Reputation:
2
Jon, can you post David Mawby's photos? Ian, sorry you lost the post. It seems that at least at the scuttle, the profile at the top of Mick's photos is the same as the one I got from Ken Morton. Can anyone provide profile photos of the one at the cowl that has the channel?
Erich in Seattle
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 686 Threads: 112
Reputation:
2
Tony, I will admit to being a bit of a rivet counter. Restoring my 31 Ulster, and my Ulster Rep, I've noted that the commonly available rubber strips don't actually fit very well. But I'm not so anally retentive to ask if the slots on the screws were aligned horizontally, vertically or randomly. ;-)
Erich in Seattle
Joined: Jan 2018 Posts: 152 Threads: 11
Reputation:
1
Location: Brecon
Car type: 1932 4-seat Tourer, 1925 Pram Hood Chummy
Just a small correction, the bonnet rubber shown at the bottom of my photo is actually Edgware Motor Rubber's stock item number 369 and not 447 as stated.
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 209 Threads: 1
Reputation:
7
If someone is eventually proved right in this fascinating discussion,I wonder what the outcome will be.
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 209 Threads: 1
Reputation:
7
You seem to be in the minority in that case Ivor.