The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined variable $search_thread - Line: 60 - File: showthread.php(1617) : eval()'d code PHP 8.1.31 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/showthread.php(1617) : eval()'d code 60 errorHandler->error_callback
/showthread.php 1617 eval




Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Brake shafts...
#1
Afternoon everyone.

I'm tackling the brake shaft on the Cambridge Special at the moment. All the levers are off, it's all gone ok so far...
However, I'm now at the point where I could do with some help from those who know.

Should this shaft separate into 2 pieces? (The long slim inner and the shorter, chunkier outer)

And if it should separate, how should one go about it?

I've used gentle heat, penetrating oil and mild to reasonable force with a mallet and block of wood, and had no movement.

Any ideas or info will be very much appreciated.

Pete.

   
   
   
Reply
#2
This is a well discussed item , if you search "cross shaft" on this site or on the previous BRAVENET  site , you should find more than you need.
Reply
#3
No Pete, this did begin life as an inner and outer piece, but no you cannot separate them.
Reply
#4
Peter, thank you. I was searching 'brake shaft' but not getting much come up. Cross shaft is of course the correct term - total brain fade! Thank you!

Andrew cheers, that's interesting, I was under the impression that it was supposed to turn as a compensating system. I guess I need to do some more research!

Thanks gents.
Reply
#5
Yes the outer it is supposed to allow movement to compensate for twist in the main shaft, however in practice this twist is almost nil and they often appear seized. They are pinned and plug welded at the centre so extremely difficult to separated without damage, if you can find the original thread I posted a number of photographs which will illustrate.
Black Art Enthusiast
Reply
#6
It does seem a curious design. Any observant souls who troubled to think about ithe construction must have been very perplexed. A larger single tube would appear a far more simple but maybe would not suit existing fittings so well. The Williams special book reckons springing of the brackets the main problem; as the net pull is forward on rhs and backward on lhs, this  would seem more important. Hopefully a good malleting may free the tubes.
Reply
#7
Bob, if you think the Austin has a curious design, take a look at the various efforts Morris tried with the flat-nose Cowley between 1928 and 1931! I think there were four different attempts at trying to get a compensating system, and by all accounts each revision was more complicated and yet less effective than the previous design ... Some designers in the late 1920s just didn't understand how to get a four-wheel braking system to work satisfactorily.
Reply
#8
Riley had a fairly effective solution, with one cable and lots of pulleys operating all four brakes. There is quite a lot of pedal travel and sponginess because of the long cable, but it works.
Robert Leigh
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)