Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 952 Threads: 38
Reputation:
7
looks the vintage business, nice work.Not sure on the performance side of things
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 3,006 Threads: 168
Reputation:
37
Location: Sherwood Forest
Car type: 1938 Talbot Ten Airline
It's a shame they're not handed the other way round - it would be better with the float chambers at the front ...
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 116 Threads: 8
Reputation:
6
Location: NE England
Looks the part. The gaskets between the manifolds and inlet to carbs will give some insulation, a small aluminium heat shield curling under the float chambers may also help. A throttle linkage will be your next problem, is 'open' in a forward or rearwards pulling motion? It looks rearward to me?
Dave
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 3,393 Threads: 106
Reputation:
28
Location: Darkest Bedfordshire
I don't see any obvious reason why it wouldn't go alright once 'tuned' - set-up would be the tricky bit.
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 1,462 Threads: 26
Reputation:
17
Location: North Yorkshire
05-03-2019, 05:18 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-03-2019, 06:20 PM by Steve Jones.)
As Mike Costigan says, above, the float chambers should be to the front, not the rear. Both pairs of carburettors are made for engines that have them mounted on the Off-Side. Mounted on the Near-Side as these are, they will be constantly trying to fight gravity - apart from when going down hill.
Steve
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 1,534 Threads: 60
Reputation:
20
I recall reading Solex literature of the period claiming that it didn't matter if the float chamber was ahead or behind.
Charles
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 557 Threads: 89
Reputation:
7
Location: Deepest darkest Kent
Solex carburettor's were available with left or right hand float chambers.
I agree with Steve and Mike that the float chamber should be to the front otherwise starvation can occur when hillclimbing.
Obviously I don't have any problems setting up Solex's and am now a worldwide ambassador for them.