17-03-2025, 07:47 PM
Yes, from my AF. The wings should be the same.
The following warnings occurred: | ||||||||||||
Warning [2] Undefined variable $search_thread - Line: 60 - File: showthread.php(1617) : eval()'d code PHP 8.1.32 (Linux)
|
Greetings! New owner from India
|
17-03-2025, 07:47 PM
Yes, from my AF. The wings should be the same.
20-03-2025, 08:07 AM
Dear Tony, thank you so much for the measurements! We were off by an extra inch. After your reply, we've redone the wings and they now look right.
Could I trouble you for a few more measurements, for which I'd be grateful: 1) Width of start of running board (flat part) front wing side 2) Width of end of running board (flat part) rear wing side 3) By approx. how much doe the centre of the rear wing stick out from the tub? 4) Gap between the centerline of the rear tyre (top) and bottom lip of rear wing I have attached some ref pics with red highlights to show the areas. Kind regards, Prithvi
20-03-2025, 12:45 PM
1) Width of start of running board (flat part) front wing side = 70mm
2) Width of end of running board (flat part) rear wing side = 50mm 3) By approx. how much does the centre of the rear wing stick out from the tub? = about 30mm to the lower edge of the wing (allowing for the curve) 4) Gap between the centerline of the rear tyre (top) and bottom lip of rear wing = about 90 to 100 mm when fitted with new springs (as my car is)
20-03-2025, 02:40 PM
Perfect, thanks so much Tony!
21-03-2025, 07:04 AM
Hi Tony,
Can you check the running board width again please? 70 mm in front at the widest part is looking very narrow. Is it 170 mm in front and 50 mm at rear end?
21-03-2025, 04:07 PM
Ahah, a wing tank in situ, jolly nice too!
22-03-2025, 01:21 AM
Sorry, a misprint. The front width is, indeed, 170mm.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|