The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined variable $search_thread - Line: 60 - File: showthread.php(1617) : eval()'d code PHP 8.1.29 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/showthread.php(1617) : eval()'d code 60 errorHandler->error_callback
/showthread.php 1617 eval




Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A Real Cracker.
#1
Another recent acquisition of a very early chummy and a real cracker. 
A beautiful clear image and a Birmingham registration, could even be a publicity shot.

   
Reply
#2
Nice!

I have a cropped version which looks as though it's had a bit of re-touching (the bolts for the radiator mounting are air-brushed out) so your suggestion that it was a factory publicity shot is quite likely.
Reply
#3
Lovely picture.

Did the early cars have the starting handle hanging loose?
Reply
#4
Hi Robert

Great photo of a very early car. But why is the driver looking so grim?  Perhaps because the early cars have no shock absorbers?

Cheers

Howard
Reply
#5
Given that one of the cars that took part in the Boulogne race in August 1923 was registered OK 8945, this car is possibly a '23 model. I also believe it to be a publicity shot as I recognise the driver from other shots. Curious to know who they are, the lady appears younger but very period in her fashionable hat and fox fur. Also the location; the building appears to be some sort of institution with the affixed signs on the end (?) wall and by the door. Anyone from the West Midlands might know?
Reply
#6
This picture appears cropped in Chris Harvey's book on page 19.
Reply
#7
Also used the "For The Parson" ad. July 27th 1923.

[Image: 8149091900_6c62c441e9_c.jpg]
Reply
#8
Excellent find Austin. So almost certainly one of Austin's publicity cars and 1923 not '24.
Reply
#9
(03-09-2024, 08:25 PM)Robert Foreman Wrote: Excellent find Austin. So almost certainly one of Austin's publicity cars and 1923 not '24.

It's from a copy of LC&CC that I have, as is this one. July 13th 1923. Could be the same car?

[Image: 8149092706_ed0b1e5488_c.jpg]
Reply
#10
Sorry Robert, Austin's research prompted me to look at more images. This is dated 25th May 1923. Pretty conclusive to the date of the car.. At least the driver looks a little more cheerful in this one...

   

In fact, digging just a little deeper, this image is dated October 5th 1923... QED!!

   
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)