The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined variable $search_thread - Line: 60 - File: showthread.php(1617) : eval()'d code PHP 8.1.31 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/showthread.php(1617) : eval()'d code 60 errorHandler->error_callback
/showthread.php 1617 eval




Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Shells or white metal
#1
Good evening all,

Can someone please tell me when shell bearings for big ends came in. My engine no is 
M278745 and I should like to know whether it’s a late enough engine to be fitted with shells.

Thanks,
Charles
Reply
#2
According to the A7 Companion, shell bearings were fitted from engine no 268659 in March 1937.  

(However, my engine M289617 has non-original white metal bearings following an engine rebuild sometime in the distant past - so engine number may not reflect what is in there.)

Colin
Reply
#3
(17-05-2018, 06:51 PM)Colin Morgan Wrote: According to the A7 Companion, shell bearings were fitted from engine no 268659 in March 1937.  

(However, my engine M289617 has non-original white metal bearings following an engine rebuild sometime in the distant past - so engine number may not reflect what is in there.)

Colin

Thanks Colin, that’s helpful.

I will now drop the sump etc later this year and have a look see. I have a feeling that one of the big ends is trying to draw attention to itself. I normally take the engine out for any work but replacing shells from below shouldn’t be too difficult.
Ref the other thread on SU versus Zenith — I have a one inch SU fitted and reckon it’s a lot better than the original carb. ( D3 needle) Climbing the hills around here is easier ( ok they’re not proper hills) and getting to 50 mph and sustaining that is no problem.

Charles
Reply
#4
Yes, I managed to take out and later refit a remetalled No 3 con rod without removing the engine.  However, I think I was lucky that the crank journal was serviceable - hardly marked and within the (couple of thou?) ovality limit.  (Getting a series of accurate micrometer measurements upsidedown in the confines of the crankcase took a bit of practice.)

Colin
Reply
#5
(17-05-2018, 07:40 PM)Colin Morgan Wrote: Yes, I managed to take out and later refit a remetalled No 3 con rod without removing the engine.  However, I think I was lucky that the crank journal was serviceable - hardly marked and within the (couple of thou?) ovality limit.  (Getting a series of accurate micrometer measurements upsidedown in the confines of the crankcase took a bit of practice.)

Colin

That’s a good point  — I’m rather hoping that the wear is taken by the shells rather than the journal, which I believe to be the case normally.

Charles
Reply
#6
I've changed both big end and centre main shells from underneath, it's quite do-able so long as no damage on crankpins needs rectifying. Not much to lose though - in that case you still have to take the engine out but it's drained and the sump's off already.
Reply
#7
Could I ask whether shell bearing conrods are any use for retrofitting on earlier 2 bearing 1 5/16" engines?
Reply
#8
They aren’t really interchangeable. I’m not saying it’s never been done but 3brg rods are offset slightly to compensate for the different big end journal spacing. ( needed to get the centre bearing in)
Alan Fairless
Reply
#9
(17-05-2018, 07:14 PM)Charles Levien Wrote:
(17-05-2018, 06:51 PM)Colin Morgan Wrote: According to the A7 Companion, shell bearings were fitted from engine no 268659 in March 1937.  

(However, my engine M289617 has non-original white metal bearings following an engine rebuild sometime in the distant past - so engine number may not reflect what is in there.)

Colin

Thanks Colin, that’s helpful.

I will now drop the sump etc later this year and have a look see. I have a feeling that one of the big ends is trying to draw attention to itself. I normally take the engine out for any work but replacing shells from below shouldn’t be too difficult.
Ref the other thread on SU versus Zenith — I have a one inch SU fitted and reckon it’s a lot better than the original carb. ( D3 needle) Climbing the hills around here is easier ( ok they’re not proper hills) and getting to 50 mph and sustaining that is no problem.

Charles
Yes, it's quite possible to change the shells from below. I did it once on the rally field at Beaulieu. I was camping so I drained the oil into the washing up bowl, and used the frying pan for all the nuts and bolts (none lost in the grass), checked what size shells I needed and found the right ones on a stall, then put it all together again, and drove back to Cambridge in the evening.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)