16-12-2021, 05:35 PM
(This post was last modified: 16-12-2021, 05:45 PM by AustinWood.)
That appears to be an early coil engine, 1929 or 30.
The sump fitted looks like an Alan Raeburn alloy sump. This is much thicker than the pressed tin Austin Sump.
The gasket is also very thick.
We have a similar sump.
I don't use a gasket. Instead I used Threebond 1184. This sticks very tightly and improves the rigidity of the crankcase
The sump did foul the chassis, but is easily relieved by filing the edge to give clearance. It's still a tight fit and the engine has to be raised slightly to remove the sump.
Also the front bolt for the internal gauze filter stopped the sump sealing to the crankcase. Using no washer on the bolt was sufficient to give clearance (just). The thick gasket you have probably avoids that problem but aggravates the other.
I've just noticed that the sump bolts have been replaced with studs. That will obstruct sump removal without raising the engine.
The sump fitted looks like an Alan Raeburn alloy sump. This is much thicker than the pressed tin Austin Sump.
The gasket is also very thick.
We have a similar sump.
I don't use a gasket. Instead I used Threebond 1184. This sticks very tightly and improves the rigidity of the crankcase
The sump did foul the chassis, but is easily relieved by filing the edge to give clearance. It's still a tight fit and the engine has to be raised slightly to remove the sump.
Also the front bolt for the internal gauze filter stopped the sump sealing to the crankcase. Using no washer on the bolt was sufficient to give clearance (just). The thick gasket you have probably avoids that problem but aggravates the other.
I've just noticed that the sump bolts have been replaced with studs. That will obstruct sump removal without raising the engine.
Jim