24-04-2023, 06:48 PM
(This post was last modified: 24-04-2023, 07:26 PM by Tony Griffiths.)
(24-04-2023, 03:01 PM)John Mason Wrote: I am sure that Tony Griffiths is a fine chap but I would not trust one of his photos. He appears to be a bigger rogue with Photoshop than the Dutchman selling the car.
Sorry Tony but your photoshop editing has a too good a reputation.
John Mason.
Well, it's not that good - it's a job that took only a few minutes of work and I have left the image very much too clear. Give somebody far better than me at Photoshop and you be convinced it was true(it's the fiddly details and shows that take the time). So, today, treat every photograph with suspicion. Have you seen examples of ones constructed by the latest AI systems? One won a prestigious award until the fake was discovered. But it's not just the A1-generated ones that are the problem, it's those then subjected to further processing by skilful hand work that can bend the mind. Even worse are the Deep Fake Video Makers - these can impose your fizzog onto a bank robber (or worse). In case you've not seen an example: https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=fak...ORM%3DVDRE But, there also "Reality Defenders" that detect fakes - using much the same system that created them.