The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined variable $search_thread - Line: 60 - File: showthread.php(1617) : eval()'d code PHP 8.1.30 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/showthread.php(1617) : eval()'d code 60 errorHandler->error_callback
/showthread.php 1617 eval




Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
MORRIS MINOR BRAKES. 48-62 or 62-71
#5
How old are your brake hoses ? These can collapse internally severely restricting fluid flow whist looking perfectly OK and serviceable on the outer surface of the hose. I would certainly consider stripping the master cylinder and replacing all the rubbers with new and at the same time checking the bore for any surface corrosion scoring etc. A rotating stone hone is available for cleaning up the bore - the bore can also be S/S sleeved or failing that, new master cylinders are available.

Note that the early 1948 to 1962 master cylinder had a 7/8" bore whereas the 1962 onwards had a 13/16" bore.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
MORRIS MINOR BRAKES. 48-62 or 62-71 - by Rpm - 01-04-2021, 07:57 PM
RE: MORRIS MINOR BRAKES. 48-62 or 62-71 - by Jeff Taylor - 01-04-2021, 08:40 PM
RE: MORRIS MINOR BRAKES. 48-62 or 62-71 - by Rpm - 01-04-2021, 08:58 PM
RE: MORRIS MINOR BRAKES. 48-62 or 62-71 - by Rpm - 01-04-2021, 10:06 PM
RE: MORRIS MINOR BRAKES. 48-62 or 62-71 - by Rpm - 04-04-2021, 08:20 PM
RE: MORRIS MINOR BRAKES. 48-62 or 62-71 - by Rpm - 07-04-2021, 09:26 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)