The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined variable $search_thread - Line: 60 - File: showthread.php(1617) : eval()'d code PHP 8.1.30 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/showthread.php(1617) : eval()'d code 60 errorHandler->error_callback
/showthread.php 1617 eval




Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
REMOTE OIL FILTER. nippy engine bay
#17
I know my engine is clean internally. I rebuilt it with a Phoenix crank about 10,000 miles ago and had it in pieces recently to fix oil leaks that had developed.
I was using straight 30 and had been thinking of looking for 5/30 for some time. I think keeping to the specified viscosity, ie 30, is a good idea and the 5/30 means that the oil pressure when cold is much lower. I also seem to have an improvement in performance, which I think may be down to modern oil technology.
I don't have a camshaft to hand and don't know what the lift is on a standard cam. However it is a slow revving engine so less of an issue.
I have a Citroen SM which has aggressive cams on flat bucket tappets. It is also high-revving for 1970. Zinc is essential and good used cams are very rare.
In the 1960's I used Castrol XL because I liked the smell. Some of the cheap oils smelt dreadful!
Jim
Reply


Messages In This Thread
REMOTE OIL FILTER. nippy engine bay - by Rpm - 23-04-2020, 09:00 PM
RE: REMOTE OIL FILTER. nippy engine bay - by Rpm - 24-04-2020, 09:42 AM
RE: REMOTE OIL FILTER. nippy engine bay - by Rpm - 24-04-2020, 11:12 AM
RE: REMOTE OIL FILTER. nippy engine bay - by Rpm - 24-04-2020, 08:28 PM
RE: REMOTE OIL FILTER. nippy engine bay - by Rpm - 25-04-2020, 12:21 PM
RE: REMOTE OIL FILTER. nippy engine bay - by AustinWood - 28-04-2020, 09:37 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)