21-11-2018, 08:32 PM
isn't it more that the crank and camshaft are chocolate teapots, and would result in the crankcase becoming vulnerable? They are now only valuable in their association to originality, presuamably.
I guess the question is: is there still any real risk to a 65 crankcase IF rebuilt as everyones' thoughts? I would have thought that it must be a little higher because it will be physically being used vs. not being used at all. But that is the only reason for putting it aside, if you don't like risk in any form!
I guess the question is: is there still any real risk to a 65 crankcase IF rebuilt as everyones' thoughts? I would have thought that it must be a little higher because it will be physically being used vs. not being used at all. But that is the only reason for putting it aside, if you don't like risk in any form!