15-09-2018, 08:02 AM
(This post was last modified: 15-09-2018, 08:06 AM by Bob Culver.)
Thanks Tony
When the topic was last raised there seemed little awareness of the change in c.r about 1933. The curious thing is that contemporary road tests (and present owners) seem to report a better performance from the generally RN updraught low comp cars than the RP?! Maybe at revs the lc breathes better, despite carb.Usual quoted bhp seem not to be the max.
I wonder if the crank is cracked?
When the topic was last raised there seemed little awareness of the change in c.r about 1933. The curious thing is that contemporary road tests (and present owners) seem to report a better performance from the generally RN updraught low comp cars than the RP?! Maybe at revs the lc breathes better, despite carb.Usual quoted bhp seem not to be the max.
I wonder if the crank is cracked?