03-07-2018, 12:56 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-07-2018, 01:27 PM by Biddlecombe.)
(03-07-2018, 12:16 PM)James Anderson Wrote: In theory, the model that Jon has spotted should have a long wheelbase and that is as comfortable to drive as a Ruby. But I would check with the seller. Also, I thought that the fuel tank should be at the rear but can't see any evidence of this and on checking the A7 Companion this feature didn't happen until September 1932. Would be nice to see an under the bonnet photo and that would reveal the answer. Agree with Jon that if it has got the right paperwork on the face of it, it seems a good buy and certainly worth a look but as he also points out, it is priced to sell quickly.
Thanks James. I haven't researched but is the engine size in the description at 858 cc correct??
BOUGHT IT. DEPOSIT PAID. Anybody fancy a trip from Sussex to Grimsby!
(03-07-2018, 12:56 PM)Biddlecombe Wrote:I have an engine number but not a chassis number yet, The Reg doesn't seem to be on the register. Can I trace it through the engine number?(03-07-2018, 12:16 PM)James Anderson Wrote: In theory, the model that Jon has spotted should have a long wheelbase and that is as comfortable to drive as a Ruby. But I would check with the seller. Also, I thought that the fuel tank should be at the rear but can't see any evidence of this and on checking the A7 Companion this feature didn't happen until September 1932. Would be nice to see an under the bonnet photo and that would reveal the answer. Agree with Jon that if it has got the right paperwork on the face of it, it seems a good buy and certainly worth a look but as he also points out, it is priced to sell quickly.
Thanks James. I haven't researched but is the engine size in the description at 858 cc correct??
BOUGHT IT. DEPOSIT PAID. Anybody fancy a trip from Sussex to Grimsby!