The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined variable $search_thread - Line: 60 - File: showthread.php(1617) : eval()'d code PHP 8.1.31 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/showthread.php(1617) : eval()'d code 60 errorHandler->error_callback
/showthread.php 1617 eval




Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
H1 SU versus Ruby Zenith sidedraft
#9
This topic was covered at length in the old website and the virtue of the various SUs was agreed. Besides, a polished horizontal (not semi dd) SU looks neat.
The piston and aperture of the 1 and 11/8 are the same; the former may give a more progressive throttle action . The horizontal 1 1/8 with dashpot ex postwar Morris  is relatively common.
Where I lived involved a mile pull every evening up a road constructed for the early trams so had a uniform grade which matched the Seven flat out in 3rd. So every day was a road test. A carb bored to 19mm was a slight improvement but the 1 1/8 SU better still. Made as much difference as the later head so must represent a couple of hp or so. Also very smooth in stop go traffic. Curiously a larger manifold seemed to not assist. The needle size can be checked by manipulating the start enrichment.
I retained the Morris needle and did 38 mpg flat out everywhere. In earlier times as original  driven at 40-45 a carefully checked 50 mpg was routinely attained on trips and presumably could with the right needle.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
H1 SU versus Ruby Zenith sidedraft - by JonE - 17-05-2018, 09:28 AM
RE: H1 SU versus Ruby Zenith sidedraft - by JonE - 17-05-2018, 04:51 PM
RE: H1 SU versus Ruby Zenith sidedraft - by Alan - 17-05-2018, 04:42 PM
RE: H1 SU versus Ruby Zenith sidedraft - by Bob Culver - 17-05-2018, 08:51 PM
RE: H1 SU versus Ruby Zenith sidedraft - by JonE - 17-05-2018, 09:25 PM
RE: H1 SU versus Ruby Zenith sidedraft - by JonE - 21-05-2018, 12:45 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)