Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 314 Threads: 9
Reputation:
6
Location: TINOPAI NZ
Hi KEITH,
A Couple of things make sure that the oil to the big end journal is clear.
and clean the conrod assemble and check that the bigend with out shells is round if not will need to be resized
last i would recommend not to rebuild B/E journal but to grind all four to ether 10 or 20 th under size depending on what the damaged B/E will clean up at.
Hope that is of some Help
Colin NZ
Joined: Mar 2015 Posts: 5,466 Threads: 231
Reputation:
67
Location: Scotchland
The crank shown in Marcus’ photos is the type made by IKE.
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 2,748 Threads: 31
Reputation:
95
Location: Auckland, NZ
As with seat inserts sad tales of failed sprayed crank build ups abound. The usual response is "the process is now improved....."
And maybe not so much now when large radii are normal, but reconditoners were notorious for tightening the radii. If the crank is nitrided it is a pity to grind the radii, although I suppose with the larger crank the fatigue protection is less vital..
Joined: Mar 2015 Posts: 5,466 Threads: 231
Reputation:
67
Location: Scotchland
Thanks Henry,
I guess my point was that the Austin design is darn sight closer than any of the reproduction ones I have fitted. But as noted above, I am not sure that seems to matter, at least not for 1 5/16”.
I have a similar blueprint - possibly the same source - I noted several variations in the finished cranks and wonder if this was the copy kept in the drawing office and it is the one that went to the shop that had all the final details for production added to it? I would like a copy of that one for sure.
Joined: Oct 2021 Posts: 16 Threads: 2
Reputation:
0
Location: New Zealand
Car type: 1937 Austin 7 Special under construction
A friend who has built a type 59 Bugatti motor virtually from scratch is advising laser welding for the crankshaft build-up. At the moment, this is the way I plan top go.
Joined: Mar 2015 Posts: 5,466 Threads: 231
Reputation:
67
Location: Scotchland
Sounds good, have you worked out why it has failed, twice, and rectified the problem?