Joined: Dec 2017 Posts: 1,160 Threads: 68
Reputation:
8
Location: Nottinghamshire. Robin Hood County
Car type: Austin Ruby Mk1 1935
IJust by chance whilst browsing the Internet on you tube I found a road test report on an Austin Seven Ruby by Autocar. It came out reasonable well until it came to braking comparing it with moderns. It did however state that the foot brake only braked on the front wheels. I know early sevens used this system but thought by the time Ruby's were made all Sevens were 4 wheel braking. Can anyone confirm this.
John Mason.
Would you believe it "Her who must be obeyed" refers to my Ruby as the toy.
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 2,400 Threads: 33
Reputation:
36
Location: Deepest Frogland 30960
Car type: 1933 RP Standard Saloon
03-01-2018, 05:32 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-01-2018, 05:33 PM by Reckless Rat.)
Journalist talking out of his arse, as usual. Coupled (ie 4 wheel) braking was introduced on the Austin Seven in 1930 so well before the Ruby/pearl/opal series cars.
Joined: Dec 2017 Posts: 1,160 Threads: 68
Reputation:
8
Location: Nottinghamshire. Robin Hood County
Car type: Austin Ruby Mk1 1935
Thank you all. I now also understand the journalist was speaking from his rectum hence a lot of hot air.
John Mason
Would you believe it "Her who must be obeyed" refers to my Ruby as the toy.
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 2,748 Threads: 31
Reputation:
95
Location: Auckland, NZ
The road test alluded to, on Youtube, is a bit lame. It is not clear if 28 metre stop distance was from 40 or 30 mph, 60%, 34% repectively. For semi Girling cars , road tests typically recorded 80% from 30 mph. Many now claim better for all models. In emergencies (and in some contemporary road tests) drivers of coupled Sevens still resorted to pedal plus lever!
Until the 1950s most cars including new had significant lost steering motion. If gear changes as slow as in the test were adopted the acceleration of moderns would not be spectacular. Testers seldom seem to have extensive experience of old cars generally. They compare with moderns. If the intention was to represent typical new car motoring in the late 30s a Ruby not a great example. Impression of a 1928 model more befitting the occasion would have been interesting.
Cars are usually presented for tests immaculate but often lacking mechanically. Unless driven regularly by persons familiar with older cars, many defects pass un recognised.
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 686 Threads: 112
Reputation:
2
I'm with Bob on this one. Any journalist worth his salt would have done his research to know how the brakes worked. And the test is hardly decisive as he assumes that an 80 year old Ruby would have behaved quite like one that had just left the works.
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 3,005 Threads: 168
Reputation:
37
Location: Sherwood Forest
Car type: 1938 Talbot Ten Airline
Why not? The first RPs date from October 1932.
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 984 Threads: 6
Reputation:
12
Location: Scottish Borders
Just a thought, not having read the original road test. Could it be that the car being tested was braking only on the front? ie They were out of adjustment so the rears were doing nothing.
I always found the front/rear compensation was not great and the fronts needed to bite in advance of the rears.
Jim
