Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 861 Threads: 74
Reputation:
10
Very smart. Press reports at the time suggest the new front suspension design made them even more "interesting" to steer than the standard Seven set up! The front spring was connected directly to the stub-axle assembly without the use of a rigid axle.
Joined: May 2018 Posts: 2,953 Threads: 558
Reputation:
20
Location: Peak District, Derbyshire
Car type: 1929 Chummy, 1930 Chummy, 1930 Ulster Replica, 1934 Ruby
All the same - but all very different. It makes one wonder if any parts would interchange with a 7 of the same year.
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 861 Threads: 74
Reputation:
10
Yes, as far as I can make out the camber angle changes with deflection of the spring, hence the poor handling properties.
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 966 Threads: 117
Reputation:
3
Location: Melton Mowbray.
BMW commenced production of a new swing front axle on 17th December 1930 and first sales commenced on 10th February 1931. These were built in parallel with the fixed axle variety but more swing axle models were offered than the rigid. viz: chassis, open 2-seater, tourer, saloon, coupé 2 and 4-seater cabriolet.
This new BMW 3/15 PS DA4 had other features - a shorter scuttle, and a more spacious body accomplished by the deletion of the luggage boot.
The swing axle was not without controversy particularly from Dipl.-Ing. Josef Ganz, the publisher of the Motor Kritik magazine. He argued that the camber angle changed when the suspension was compressed and this was dangerous. A fierce argument developed between the two parties. Initially BMW did not accept the criticism but did eventually made changes.
Of interest is that at this time sales were falling. BMW approached Austin requesting the agreed licence fees be reduced. Herbert Austin reacted angrily to this and in a five page letter pointed out all the errors he perceived that Dixi / BMW had made - design, price and too large factory premises. An argument ensued, but Austin stood his ground.
By the end of '31 compete cessation of vehicle production was seriously considered by BMW.
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 1,337 Threads: 34
Reputation:
30
Location: Cheshire
Car type: Race Ulster, 1926 Special, 1927 Chummy, 1930 Box
Hang on a minute, there may be more to this than meets the eye. Normally with swing axles the camber goes negative as the axle goes into bump. Here, as the stub axle rise the spring lengthens and with a clever bit of maths could cancel the camber change. Were they that clever? Who can say.
Alan Fairless
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 926 Threads: 22
Reputation:
10
Location: Near Cambridge, UK
Car type: 1928 tourer (mag type), short chassis Gould Ulster
That picture gives considerable enlightenment compared with the words in earlier comments. The arrangement appears to be such that camber changes would be insignificant, and deflection would only cause minimal change to toe-in.