Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 3,329 Threads: 372
Reputation:
16
Car type:
Someone restored it wrongly? (So we won't actually be getting an objective comparison between the single and the double operation after all, now!)
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 123 Threads: 23
Reputation:
0
Location: Doncaster, gateway to northern civilisation
Only if the brass discs have compromised the comparison.
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 1,715 Threads: 47
Reputation:
25
Location: Auckland NZ
Car type: 36 Nippy, 31 RM, 38 Special, 24 Works Rep
I have come across brass disks on the front of late Ruby's on a couple of occasions, I have no way of knowing for sure if this was original fitment.
Black Art Enthusiast
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 3,329 Threads: 372
Reputation:
16
Car type:
how late is your car, Mick?
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 123 Threads: 23
Reputation:
0
Location: Doncaster, gateway to northern civilisation
09-10-2021, 08:17 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-10-2021, 08:19 AM by Mick Hanna.)
It's 1936, an early ARR, but it was extensively refurbished in the mid-1980s by A. Archers of Dunmow.
Thanks, Ian. It's not something you would ordinarily notice unless dismantling. Good to know later ones may have them.
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 636 Threads: 19
Reputation:
10
Location: Hampshire UK
Hi
I have never been quite sure why brass discs are needed, unless it is to keep damp wooden discs away from contact with the steel parts to avoid rust buildup.
I converted some time back to a twin front setup, and found a small but worthwhile improvement in stability. One would expect an increase in roll damping for the twin setup, as the single arrangement suffers from reduced damping when the arms are travelling in opposite directions.
The only downside is that the modern adjusting nuts have standard threads rather than the fine pitch of the original, which makes setting the correct tension more difficult. I use a spring balance and aim for about 18 lb at the end of the arm before it begins to move.