Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 3,421 Threads: 107
Reputation:
28
Location: Darkest Bedfordshire
As Colin says, ethanol simply doesn't release as much energy when burned as conventional petrol, so mpg must suffer to a small extent; though in fact E10 is a limit rather than a specification, so there may not be much real difference with present forecourt fuels. I suggest this is the least of our worries. I use whatever comes out of the pump and haven't noticed any issues with my cars.
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 318 Threads: 12
Reputation:
8
Would be interested to see what happens if you do a similar test with a tin with a "breather" hole in it.
The problems we had with E10 are in our Ulster and old lawnmower, both with breather holes / slight leaks in the filler cap.
Joined: Aug 2017 Posts: 1,987 Threads: 90
Reputation:
17
Location: Ripon
This sounds like an interesting practical lab. test for water content. The only drawback I can see is that there is no representative introduction of air on a regular cycle. While driving and refilling a tank on a car there will be a large change of air/vapour volume when topping up the fuel and as air (25% water vapour) is drawn in through the vented cap as the petrol is drawn out for combustion.