The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.1.31 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code 2 errorHandler->error_callback
/printthread.php 287 eval
/printthread.php 117 printthread_multipage



Austinsevenfriends
1923 chummy - Printable Version

+- Austinsevenfriends (https://www.austinsevenfriends.co.uk/forum)
+-- Forum: Austin Seven Friends Forum (https://www.austinsevenfriends.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Forum chat... (https://www.austinsevenfriends.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+--- Thread: 1923 chummy (/showthread.php?tid=3479)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5


1923 chummy - J Faulkner - 01-11-2019

Hi all, just to let you know there is a nice 1923 chummy currently for sale on e bay. Here is the link
 https://rover.ebay.com/rover/0/0/0?mpre=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebay.co.uk%2Fulk%2Fitm%2F333382435818


RE: 1923 chummy - Tony Betts - 01-11-2019

looks a nice car.

mainly correct, if nothings altered. it shouldnt stay for sale to long.

would suggest its a little cheap.

go for it joe Wink


RE: 1923 chummy - Tony Press - 02-11-2019

Being picky- shouldn't the gear lever be more vertical ?


RE: 1923 chummy - JonE - 02-11-2019

I like the comment about the biscuits.


RE: 1923 chummy - Mike Costigan - 02-11-2019

(02-11-2019, 01:51 AM)Tony Press Wrote: Being picky- shouldn't the gear lever be more vertical ?

Yes, the gear lever is a later (longer) version - that's about all I could pick fault with, and the longer lever makes for a better gear change...


RE: 1923 chummy - Tony Betts - 02-11-2019

this is the arguement with a 1923 car.

its between a less useable totally original car, or one with a few tweeks.

for me i love the total originality of a car, BUT when my own 23 car goes together. i to lazzy for the starter handle. id put a CAV bsconslicer on. and like most i like a drive on a hot summers day between pubs of course. so i would fit the fan.

shame there isnt a picture under the car, to see if its on a monkey puzzle etc.

tony


RE: 1923 chummy - Tony Griffiths - 02-11-2019

(02-11-2019, 10:07 AM)Tony Betts Wrote: this is the arguement with a 1923 car.

its between a less useable totally original car, or one with a few tweeks.

for me i love the total originality of a car, BUT when my own 23 car goes together. i to lazzy for the starter handle. id put a CAV bsconslicer on. and like most i like a drive on a hot summers day between pubs of course. so i would fit the fan.

shame there isnt a picture under the car, to see if its on a monkey puzzle etc.

tony

Hi Tony,
I take a contrary view. So rare are these early cars that 100% originality should be the aim - after all, they are barely above the class of a cyclecar and, on one of those, you would not replace the bobbin steering with rack and pinion, nor add front-wheel brakes, a speedometer - or cup holders. So, why not enjoy a very early Seven for what it is - simple and basic. Revel in all the interesting original parts and delight in driving around its many minor faults and compromises - and so all the more amusing and attractive because of that.


RE: 1923 chummy - "Slack Alice" Simon - 02-11-2019

What is the handling like without shocks?

I could live with no speedo, starter, or fan - but not without a little steering.


RE: 1923 chummy - Ruairidh Dunford - 02-11-2019

They are very bouncy.


RE: 1923 chummy - Alan - 02-11-2019

I like that  Wink