+- Austinsevenfriends (https://www.austinsevenfriends.co.uk/forum)
+-- Forum: Austin Seven Friends Forum (https://www.austinsevenfriends.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Forum chat... (https://www.austinsevenfriends.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+--- Thread: Reducing camber of rear springs (/showthread.php?tid=1431)
Pages:
1
2
Reducing camber of rear springs - Tom Coates - 09-07-2018
I would like to lower the back of my GE Cup by a few inches as it sits a bit high at the moment and I think this will improve the appearance and handling. Doing this would reduce the available suspension travel but I’m not planning to do any trials so I think I can live with that.
The question is whether to have some early type springs made up with reduced camber (say 3”), or just to use Ruby springs which I think have a 2½” camber as standard.
I imagine Ruby springs would make the suspension quite stiff which might be good if there is limited travel. Does anyone have experience of using the later springs on a relatively light early car? Will they fit into the ends of the chassis rails without modification? Are there any other issues watch out for (like the axle oil pouring out of the front of the torque tube due to the change in angle?)...
RE: Reducing camber of rear springs - Peter Johnson - 09-07-2018
Hi Tom
I had a set of later springs on my car. For whatever reason, the springs foul the sidemembers at the back of the body - but a bigger problem is that the brake cables also foul the body. In the end, I bought some new chummy pattern springs from Mr Dunford Snr.
I also had to cut some material away on the seat base to stop the torque anchor grease nipple from fouling. You are welcome to try the later springs if you like as I still have them.
Peter
RE: Reducing camber of rear springs - Dave Wortley - 09-07-2018
I have had Ruby springs on my 1930 short chassis pretend Ulster for 25 years without any issues.
RE: Reducing camber of rear springs - Chris KC - 09-07-2018
Tom, have you considered having your existing springs re-set at a lower ride height?
RE: Reducing camber of rear springs - dickie65 - 09-07-2018
You can get new Nippy / Type 65 springs. which might suit. In the good old days springs were reset to change camber.
Ian Dunford I think.
RE: Reducing camber of rear springs - Jamie - 09-07-2018
Peter.
I am intrigued by the rear view of your car, which looks good. May I ask what it is?
Regards,
Jamie.
RE: Reducing camber of rear springs - Tony Press - 10-07-2018
(09-07-2018, 10:55 PM)Jamie Wrote: Peter.
I am intrigued by the rear view of your car, which looks good. May I ask what it is?
Regards,
Jamie.
I am pretty sure it is a reproduction Gordon England Cup - have a look at 'Archive Photos of Austin Sevens on Pinterest' on this forum.
https://www.pinterest.com.au/albaaustins/ge-cup-models/
Cheers, Tony.
RE: Reducing camber of rear springs - Tom Coates - 10-07-2018
(09-07-2018, 01:34 PM)Peter Johnson Wrote: Hi Tom
I had a set of later springs on my car. For whatever reason, the springs foul the sidemembers at the back of the body - but a bigger problem is that the brake cables also foul the body. In the end, I bought some new chummy pattern springs from Mr Dunford Snr.
I also had to cut some material away on the seat base to stop the torque anchor grease nipple from fouling. You are welcome to try the later springs if you like as I still have them.
Peter
Peter, thanks that is interesting - do you think they foul because the springs are bulkier or because of their camber? There seems to be quite a lot of variation in shape and detailing between bodies so I'll have to look at this carefully on mine. I was more worried about the axle hitting the body on bumps which happened when the car was previously fitted with rather soft springs. Do you have a picture of the side profile of your car?
I know that David Cochrane has lowered his car and doesn't seem to have had any problems, although I haven't seen it in the flesh.
RE: Reducing camber of rear springs - Peter Johnson - 10-07-2018
With original (late model) springs
With chummy springs
These are the Chummy springs. The top leaf of the later springs is much flatter and fouls on the inside of the body. Like you say, there is much variation in the body construction so you may not have any issues.
Peter
RE: Reducing camber of rear springs - Charles Levien - 11-07-2018
(09-07-2018, 11:12 AM)Tom Coates Wrote: I would like to lower the back of my GE Cup by a few inches as it sits a bit high at the moment and I think this will improve the appearance and handling. Doing this would reduce the available suspension travel but I’m not planning to do any trials so I think I can live with that.
The question is whether to have some early type springs made up with reduced camber (say 3”), or just to use Ruby springs which I think have a 2½” camber as standard.
I imagine Ruby springs would make the suspension quite stiff which might be good if there is limited travel. Does anyone have experience of using the later springs on a relatively light early car? Will they fit into the ends of the chassis rails without modification? Are there any other issues watch out for (like the axle oil pouring out of the front of the torque tube due to the change in angle?)...
I found using Nippy springs on my 1937 Opal gave the right clearance and excellent ride. If memory serves me right these have a 2.5 inch camber ( think standard Ruby is more) and fewer leaves than Ruby.
Charles