The following warnings occurred: | |||||||||||||||
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.1.31 (Linux)
|
![]() |
And then it went Bang - Printable Version +- Austinsevenfriends (https://www.austinsevenfriends.co.uk/forum) +-- Forum: Austin Seven Friends Forum (https://www.austinsevenfriends.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Forum chat... (https://www.austinsevenfriends.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Thread: And then it went Bang (/showthread.php?tid=66) |
RE: And then it went Bang - Tony Betts - 14-08-2017 Hi R, It could be down to the age old problem of a little knowledge being dangerous. People read about high lift cams, and double valve springs. Then thinking they have been armed with the meaning of life. They fit it to anything they touch. Not having enough knowledge to know they are doing more harm than good for there particular use. The only reason I can think of useing maxi springs, are the tight arses who buy an unused set of old springs for a £1 thinking they've saved themselves £4.00 Again, a little knowledge. It does make me laugh every time I pull these things out of engines though. I'll send you some pics of the last slip cotter I removed. Tony. RE: And then it went Bang - Zetomagneto - 14-08-2017 Fatigue failure of the block, has it been dropped during it long life,does anyone crack test these. Would be interesting to see the top face of the crankcase RE: And then it went Bang - Ian Williams - 14-08-2017 (14-08-2017, 06:34 PM)Tony Betts Wrote:(13-08-2017, 08:33 PM)Charles P Wrote: Pistons are 57.5mm. It's a mid 30's block. It looked thin to me as well. Tony I have seen these two drill holes in late blocks and crankcases, I always assumed they were there to increase the old mist in the valve chest. Dave, I was suggesting using SAE Grade 8 bolts which are an much higher tensile than metric grade 8.8 RE: And then it went Bang - Ruairidh Dunford - 14-08-2017 Ian/Tony, a friend has mesaged to say the extra holes were used in late (three bearing perhaps?) blocks - I had not noticed this before. Can anyone confirm? RE: And then it went Bang - Tony Betts - 14-08-2017 I can't remember seeing them before. That's why I thought they had been put in. I'll have a look in the morning. Tony. RE: And then it went Bang - Charles P - 14-08-2017 (14-08-2017, 11:24 PM)Tony Betts Wrote: I can't remember seeing them before. That's why I thought they had been put in. I couldn't remember seeing those bloody holes before either. Wish that I had! I'll check the block casting date but I think that's it came from a 33/34 engine The new block is vintage for all the reasons that have been said Charles RE: And then it went Bang - Ian Williams - 15-08-2017 (14-08-2017, 11:44 PM)Charles P Wrote:(14-08-2017, 11:24 PM)Tony Betts Wrote: I can't remember seeing them before. That's why I thought they had been put in. Three bearing is where I have seen them guys. RE: And then it went Bang - Ian Dunford - 15-08-2017 (13-08-2017, 02:03 PM)Charles P Wrote: Oops! Have you considered "Holts Crank and Bloc Weld"? RE: And then it went Bang - Ian Williams - 15-08-2017 I have in the workshop at the moment a January 37 block without them and a July 37 block with the holes, I probably have a few more in my spares shed. RE: And then it went Bang - Tony Betts - 15-08-2017 Charles, Your block looks to be pre three bearing engine. The ones for three bearing engines, have an extra piece on the centre stud hole. Water manifold side. Tony. |