The following warnings occurred: | |||||||||||||||
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.1.31 (Linux)
|
REMOTE OIL FILTER. nippy engine bay - Printable Version +- Austinsevenfriends (https://www.austinsevenfriends.co.uk/forum) +-- Forum: Austin Seven Friends Forum (https://www.austinsevenfriends.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Forum chat... (https://www.austinsevenfriends.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Thread: REMOTE OIL FILTER. nippy engine bay (/showthread.php?tid=4242) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: REMOTE OIL FILTER. nippy engine bay - Austin in the Shed - 24-04-2020 It's worth putting a magnet in the sump plug to pick up any metal particles. RE: REMOTE OIL FILTER. nippy engine bay - Rpm - 25-04-2020 Austin, strange you should say that I have a large powerful 4" circular magnet attached to the sump. I will take a picture and post when I remove the sump plate to see how effective the magnet has been. Regards Rob RE: REMOTE OIL FILTER. nippy engine bay - Bruce Nicholls - 25-04-2020 I have used modern multi-grades from various sources and grades (10/40 & 20/50 etc) as long as I have had the car (1971). Never had any problems due to this that I am aware of. RE: REMOTE OIL FILTER. nippy engine bay - AustinWood - 26-04-2020 I now use a semi-synthetic 5/30 which seems to work very well. I might consider using a zinc additive too but am not sure the Austin engine really needs it. RE: REMOTE OIL FILTER. nippy engine bay - Zetomagneto - 26-04-2020 The cam followers would benefit from it RE: REMOTE OIL FILTER. nippy engine bay - Derek Sheldon - 27-04-2020 RPM, I would advise against using a modern multi grade oil,IF, you don’t know the provenance of the engine. Carbon and sludge maybe what is keeping your engine running. Ok if it is a run in fairly recent rebuild then yes use modern oils , I use Halfords Classic 20/50. RE: REMOTE OIL FILTER. nippy engine bay - AustinWood - 28-04-2020 I know my engine is clean internally. I rebuilt it with a Phoenix crank about 10,000 miles ago and had it in pieces recently to fix oil leaks that had developed. I was using straight 30 and had been thinking of looking for 5/30 for some time. I think keeping to the specified viscosity, ie 30, is a good idea and the 5/30 means that the oil pressure when cold is much lower. I also seem to have an improvement in performance, which I think may be down to modern oil technology. I don't have a camshaft to hand and don't know what the lift is on a standard cam. However it is a slow revving engine so less of an issue. I have a Citroen SM which has aggressive cams on flat bucket tappets. It is also high-revving for 1970. Zinc is essential and good used cams are very rare. In the 1960's I used Castrol XL because I liked the smell. Some of the cheap oils smelt dreadful! |